Please let me state again: Finding anything sexual about Lucy’s death and stating it as “unambiguous” that stake how to conclude an english essay a reference to a penis is absurd. Have you even read the book? I’ve read the book and I understand it well. Now here is a question: If a stake really meant penis than what did it offer in the books overall meaning?
That a bunch of Christians are killing the undead by nailing their penises through people’s hearts? My gosh, it’s full of sex! I read through this summary to aid in an essay about this book and was positively shockedthough it gave me plenty of giggles! Dracula has many things about it which make it partly comedy to me, though of course it’s only due to the change of the times. The thought of Bram Stoker reading this site’s take on his novel isoh, do try it, it is HILARIOUS. Okay I should’ve gone into detail more, but the whole penis idea doesn’t fit into the plot and doesn’t make sense. Also remember, this book was written in 1897 which really wasn’t that long ago.
QUIZ: What’s your Shakespearean pick-up line? QUIZ: Which Hogwarts house do you belong to? QUIZ: How dateable would you be in the 15th century? Remember the essays you had to write in high school? Or at least, how I write one.
Who cares about symbolism in Dickens? How did things get this way? It seemed the essence of what scholars did. Aristotle in his own era. But schools change slower than scholarship. But for obvious reasons no one wanted to give that answer.
And so began the study of modern literature. English literature in the 1820s. 1876, and Oxford not till 1885. Germany in the late 19th century. Johns Hopkins in 1876, the new model spread rapidly.
Writing was one of the casualties. But how do you do research on composition? The closest thing seemed to be English literature. 700 years ago, fascinating and urgently needed work. I think lawyers would be the first to admit.
The real problem is that you can’t change the question. I need to talk the matter over. At the very least I must have explained something badly. I was saying as well. But the aim is never to be convincing per se.
I can convince smart readers I must be near the truth. Why not just sit and think? I sat down to write them. In a real essay you’re writing for yourself. They tend to peter out. Many published essays peter out in the same way.
This group says one thing. But don’t get mad at us. An essay has to come up with answers. They don’t always, of course. I’m sometimes accused of meandering. In defend-a-position writing that would be a flaw. There you’re not concerned with truth.